Book Reviews

A REVIEWER'S NOTEBOOK FOR Wtud JOHN CHAMBERLAIN OF SOMETHING BETTER ROBERT LEKACHMAN'S The Age of Keynes (Random House, $6) is aptly titled. As Professor Milton Friedman puts it, "We are all Keynesians now." At least we all have had to make adaptation to the realities of Keynesian political manipulation. But, since John Maynard Keynes said so many things at so many different times in his life (he ended by expressing his worries about the future of individualism to Professor Hay ek), professions of loyalty to the Master don't really get us very far. Marx said in his old age that he was not a Marxist, and Keynes, if he had lived, might have fol lowed suit. Keynesianism, as Professor Le kachman demonstrates, hegan as a special response to the economic condition of Britain in the nine teen twenties and thirties. Those were the days of stagnation and the dole. As Keynes said, Winston Churchill, who held the uncon genial post of Chancellor of the Exchequer in the mid-twenties, had committed himself "to force 60 down money wages and all money values, without any idea of how it was to be done." The attempt to return to the gold standard at a dollar valuation of the pound which made British costs and prices too high for competition in world markets was highly unreal istic. For better or worse, the strength of union organization in the twentieth century is such that no democratic government dares make the attempt to restore profit ability by forcing money wages down. Thus, an inflationary bias is built into the system of twen tieth century capitalism. Realist that he was, Keynes recognized the power of the labor unions. His proposals for "government invest ment" were pitched to building up "aggregate demand" to the point where capitalists could make money and still pay union wages to a lot more people. For want of something better, he offered a spe cial formula for getting off a sticky wicket.

It is easy to understand how Keynesianism got its hold on the 1966 FOR WANT OF SOMETHING BETTER 61 "VVor1J. {n. {he n.{n.~{~~n thirti~g. The trouble is that it created a new breed of economists, of whom Professor Lekachman is at least tentatively one, that sees the whole future history of the human race as a continuation of the special situation that existed between the two world wars. This breed con tinues to think of government "investment" of one sort or anoth er as the only sure guarantee of enough "aggregate demand" to keep the enterprise system going without falling prey to the social ists. The "massive spending" theory seems to have been justified by what happened in World War II, when government purchases of war material put all our factories to work and wiped out the unem ployment which had defied the most earnest cogitations of Frank lin Roosevelt's brain trusters. But it did this by breaking the dollar in two. At the same time it de stroyed the currencies and the economic plant of two big con tinents. When the war was over, a new "special situation" existed.

As Will Clayton said, the "world was naked." It had to do business with and in U.S. fifty-cent dollars. And reconstruction had to be carried forward. Psychologically, the age of stagnation had come to an end. What picked things up to create such phenomena as the "German miracle," the Japanese revival, and the long U.S. booms? If the play on words .may be pardoned, we don't find the key in Keynes, who was hipped on the monetary as pects of economics. Schumpeter, who kept his eye on technological change, is a better guide to post World War II history. Pushers vs. Pullers Economists seem to fall into two loose categories. There are the "pull" theoreticians who think that "aggregate demand" is a function of the money and credit supply. And there are the "push" theoreticians, beginning with the Say of Say's Law of Markets, who think that the creation of goods and services makes for an exchange situation that automat ically builds up "aggregate de mand." Whether one is a "pull"

theoretician or a "push" advocate may very well be a matter of glan dular endowment. The "pull" phi losophy proceeds from a pessimis tic view of the possibilities in herent in human ingenuity and human energy. The "push" view is inseparable from an optimistic trust in what inventive men are capable of. doing. During· the thirties, I spent the first half of the decade reading books about the plight of the world. Though I am congenitally an opti62 THE F~EEMAN October mist, I forced myself into the negative mold that was then all the rage in the intellectual circles that fed the New Deal. During the second half of the decade I worked for Fortune Magazine, do ing corporation stories. The latter experience was worth far more than the earlier dalliance among the pessimists. For what was happening in the thirties at the laboratory and factory level was proof to a neo phyte's wondering eyes that the tides of economics move in response to the tinkerer, the laboratory man, the inventor, the ingenious rearranger, even more than they move in response to the fiscal and monetary priests. Economists should spend more time visiting factories! In the decade of the thirties the seeds were planted that led, after 1945, to the daz zling efflorescence of the syn thetics market. The Du Pont com pany owed far more to professors of chemistry than to professors of economics.

The Keynesians, trying to raise aggregate farm income by acreage restrictions, thought they had the agricultural situation well in hand. But the new fertilizers and in secticides and genetic discoveries, coming out of the laboratories of the thirties, made a mock of re strictionism, and the modern farm revolution, which forced many an inefficient producer off the land, happened anyway. The jet plane came with the war, and is only now coming into its own com mercially, to the point where it yields higher wages to machinists who have succeeded in flouting Keynesian wage-price guideposts. The TV market, held back by gov ernmental busybodies in the thir ties, finally got off dead center. And the whole world of electron ics, pushed along by the war-born need for such things as radar, boomed along with TV. So, is it Keynesian wisdom that has kept us going since 1945, or is it the older wisdom that puts its trust in the constant emergence of so-called "ladder industries"?

The "pull" theoretician will take Professor Lekachman's word for it that Keynesian government servants have kept us prosperous. The "push" advocate will look back to older economists such as the forgotten Garet Garrett, or to Pro fessor Schumpeter, or to the Aus trians who think that if the money tinkerers desist, the inventors will have a better chance of getting their innovations to the buying public. A Way with Words Having posed my glandular bias against that of Professor Lekach man, it remains to be said that The Age of Keynes is a delight1966 FOR WANT OF SOMETHING BETTER 63 fully written book. Keynes him self was a literary man of high ability, and his way with words has rubbed off on many of his mod ern disciples. Indeed, the influence of the neo-Keynesians may be due more to their gift for phrases than their economic logic. Professor Lekachman's history is mainly correct as to the facts he uses to support his theory. But there are some' telling omissions.

It is at least slightly unhistorical to give Professor Alvin Hansen the credit - or the obloquy - for evolving the theory of permanent American secular stagnation; Rex ford Tugwell came before him, and, what is most important, it was Tugwell who sold the idea of the overbuilt economy to President Roosevelt. Again, it is a little strange to find Keynesians in gen eral, and Professor Walter Heller in particular, reaping all the high praise for the 1965 income tax cut. Conservatives have been shouting for 10, these many years that high taxes are a drag on pro ducti vity. When Keynesians re turn to common sense, it should be treated as a conversion, not a daz zling discovery. ~ Binders with Issues inserted for Calendar Years 1963 and 1964: HANDSOME BLUE LEATHERLEX FREEMAN BINDERS Either year Both $ 5.00 10.00 Binder only, $2.25 each Have You Seen RALLY Yet? You should. In fact, we are so sure you will like RALLY, we will send you a free copy ...

. . • So you can see' for yourself the most exciting journal in a decade. RALLY is a new monthly created by the young conservatives and libertarians of the "Revolt on the Campus" generation. You'll find clear, compelling writing. Graceful format. A fresh, vigorous, youthful, good-humored outlook that makes it a joy to read. These are some of the features that make RALLY "a valuable new voice of a new genera tion," in the words of the Charleston News & Courier. The be,st way we know to introduce you to this great new journal is to send you a free copy ••.and let you decide for yourself if you want to continue re ceiving RALLY each month. Simply mail the no-risk trial subscription form belo~ We will send you your free copy b return mail. If RALLY is not all you expected, jUl let us know; your trial sub will be car celled immediately. If, on the othe hand, you find RALLY to your likin~ you need do nothing more - it will 01 rive automatically. And if you act no~ you can still enjoy RALLY at mone) saving introductory rates!

r-I--il--I-I-I----::~~.:d~:::O:::~:~r:~:~:~~::~~:::~• I and send me a free copy by return mail. (Check term) D Bill me Name ----------------------D Payment enclosed* Address D 1 year at $5 ----------------------D 2 years at $9 City/State Zip D 3 years at $12.50 *Entitles me to an extra issue for each year. D Please begin my subscription with Volume 1, Number 1.~- n • - __... - " ---. ... • ....

BOUND VOLUMES OF TheJ1reemilo-19G5 Attractively sewn in a single volume with hard cover, the 12 issues from January through December, fully in dexed-768 pages, for handy reference to the latest literature on freedom. Onlf 15.00 These bound volumes of THE FREEMAN match in appearance and otherwise continue the 12-volume series of Essays on Liberty containing selections from THE FREEMAN and other Foundation releases back to 1946. (A separate cumulative subject matter, author, and title index is available for the 12 volumes of Essays on Liberty. $1.00.) Bound volumes of THE FREEMAN for 1966 will be available shortly after the end of the year. ORDER YOUR BOUND VOLUMES NOW! THE FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION IRVINGTON-ON-HUDSON, N. Y. 10533 Please send me: THE FREEMAN for 1965 $ 5.00 0 THE FREEMAN for 1965 and 1966 (The 1966 volume to be shipped when ready) $ 9.00 0 ESSAYS ON LIBERTY (Set of 12, with cumulative index) Cloth $30.00 0 Paper $20.00 D D CHECK ENCLOSED D SEND INVOICE NAME, _ STREET _ CITY _ STATE ZIP CODE _ THE LAW • No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain degree. The safest way to make laws respectedis to make them respectable. When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law.

In order to make plunderappear just and sacred to many consciences, it is only necessary for the law to decree and sanction it. Slavery, restrictions, and monopoly find de fenders not only among those who profit from them but also among those who suffer from them. FREDERIC BASTIAT (1850) NOVEMBER 1966 The Freedom Nobody Wants . The Government Veto System In' Case of Difference . The Roots of War The Law of Liberty . The Flight from Reality: 26. Conclusion: The Pen AND the Sword . Protective Taxes and Wages • Books: Shedding Friendships . Other Books . Edmund A. Opitz Lawrence Fertig Edward A. Lewis Ayn Rand Kenneth W. SoWtt Clarence 8. Carson William G. Sumner John Chamberlain 3 17 22 24 33 36 56 60 63 COAST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION Department F2 , 9th &Hill Sts., Los Angeles,California90014 o Please send me a FREE copy of "Tight Money" o I enclose my check (or money order) for $ _ o Please open a Coast Federal Savings accountD Individual D Joint in the name(s) of NAME _ STREET ---------CITY STATE _ THE FRE MAN NOVEMBER 1966 Vol. 16, ~o. 11 y# Our other cherished freedoms, sug gests Edmund Opitz, may be of little worth to us if we continue to neglect and deny the freedom of the market ........ p. 3 Y# Just how the market is prevented from functioning is spelled out in further detail as Lawrence Fertig de scribes "The Government Veto System" p. 17 Y# If the other fellow is "always right,"