Book Reviews

A REVIEWER'S NOTEBOOK JOHN CHAMBERLAIN M. STANTON EVANS believes that chickens come home to roost. Or, in the words of the late Richard Weaver, that "ideas have conse quences." The consequences of pseudo liberal ideas for the West, as they are set forth in Mr. Evans' vol uminous but tightly argued The Politics of Surrender (Devin Adair,$6.95), are likely to be pretty horrendous. The root as sumption of pseudo liberalism, as Mr. Evans sees it, is that con vergence of western capitalism and communism is more or less ordained by "history," and that there is no use fighting it. This "liberal" assumption isn't pure Marxist determinism, for the pure Marxists believe that capitalism is destined to go down in a series of catastrophic convulsions. The "liberal" assumes that as the West moves toward socialism, the Com munist East must move toward democracy, with a peaceful em brace in a world state looming as the culminating destiny of man60 kind. It never occurs to the "liberal" that socialism, which im plies state compulsion in dealing with the energies of men, is, if pressed beyond a certain point, utterly incompatible with demo cratic politics. The "merger" of West and East which the "liberal"

hopes to see accomplished depends on the surrender of one set of ideas or another - and it is the thesis of M. Stanton Evans that the West is in process of doing the surrendering. It is, of course, a straggly proc ess, for humanity balks at "clean" solutions, and ideas beget counterideas. However, the pseudo liberal has away of achiev ing bureaucratic power that is somewhat frightening. Mr. Evans begins by analyzing some of the important pseudoliberal docu ments which, even when they are officially denounced, manage to affect the speeches of important statesmen and the course of action of administrators. There are The Liberal Papers, 1967 THE POLITICS OF SURRENDER 61 with a revealing preface by James Roosevelt, for example. And there is Study Phoenix, prepared by Vincent Rock, a "senior research analyst" at something called the Institute for Defense Analysis. The ideas expressed in these and other "liberal" documents all re volve around the theory that the intentions of Moscow and Peking must be ultimately peaceful. The consequences of this theory will be devastating if it is wrong.

Mr. Evans is encyclopedic in tracing out the connections be tween idea and "happening." Study Phoenix talks about an "in terdependence" between Moscow and Washington. To Vincent Rock "interdependence" means that a "balance of terror" can be main tained by the two great powers through simultaneous cuts in arma.ment. Picking up from the Phoenix assumption, Dr. Seymour Melman of Columbia University and Dr. Jerome Wiesner of Mas.,.. sachusetts Institute of Technology have been telling recent Washing ton administrations that if the U.S. refrains from "provocative" arms building, Russia will follow suit. Hence a decision, taken in the Kennedy Administration, not to go ahead with the deployment of a Nike-Zeus or Nike-X antimissile missile system. Wiesner con sidered that such deployment might convince the Russians that we were getting ready for an atomic blowoff. The result of "scaring"· the Soviets would be to provoke them into speeding up the development of an effective anti missile grid on their own.

Alas for the Melman-Wiesner way of thinking, the Russians have gone ahead with antimissile research and development even without being "scared." Mr. Evans can take it as an ironic justification for his book that its publication practically coincided with Secretary of Defense Me Namara's announcement that the Russians have an antimissile mis sile and are proceeding to deploy it in a way that makes it neces sary for the U.S. to come up with a more potent offensive atomic weapon than can currently be fired by our forty Polaris sub marines. For libertarians, Mr. Evans' long discussion of the foreign policy ideas disseminated by "ex perts" who wrote for the publica tions of the Institute of Pacific Relations is particularly perti nent. The IPR has been denounced by a. Senate subcommittee as "a vehicle used by the communists to orientate American Far Eastern policies toward communist ob jectives." (The quote is from a 1952--report of the Senate Judi ciary Committee.) Whether or not 62 THE FREEMAN January there was conscious collusion be tween the communists and the IPR, the IPR publications encour aged the idea that Mao Tse-tung's Chinese Communism wasn't really communism, but just an Oriental version of Jeffersonian agrarian ism. The IPR writers accused Chiang Kai -shek .of heading a "corrupt" and "reactionary" gov ernment, and sold the notion to General George Marshall that there should be a "coalition" re gime in Peking. When Chiang Kai-shek refused to make a coali tionwith his Marxist enemies, the U.S. withdrew military support from the nationalist Chinese. And, after the dust had settled, the communists had taken over the mainland and Chiang had been driven to the offshore island of Formosa.

The percolation of IPR ideas did not end with the de facto creation of "two Chinas." For, as Mr. Evans points out, the IPR theories are surfacing again with the drive to throw the Formosa Chinese out of the UN and to seat Red China. This drive is of peculiar signifi cance to libertarians for the sim ple reason that it threatens an island that has become a most heartening example of what men can do in freedom. Unable to put his ideas across on the mainland because of twenty years of war and revolution, Chiang Kai-shek has had a peaceful island inter lude during which he has solved the agrarian question that still bedevils his great rival, Mao Tse tung. Instead of expropriating absentee landlords on Formosa, the Chiang government bought them out by offering them shares in the big national cement com panies. Then it proceeded to de nationalize the companies, which forthwith became very prosper ous. Thus the old landlords became the new capitalists on Formosa.

And the peasants, now in posses sion of their own rice paddies, have had an incentive that has made Formosa self-sufficient in food. Indeed, it is far more than that. Not only does the island, which is less than three hundred miles long, feed its thirteen million in habitants; it is also managing to develop a big export surplus of canned pineapple, bananas, sugar, mushrooms, and even rice. The relative economic freedom that pertains on Formosa has given Free China the second highest standard of living in the Far East. By contrast, Mao Tse-tung's Red China is the worst of slums. Since these are ascertainable facts, it is doubly amazing that the "politicians of surrender" should even dare to talk about handing Free China's seat in the 1967 THE POLITICS OF SURRENDER 63 UN to Red China, or even to pro mote a "two China policy" that would weaken Formosa's defenses in a world that shows no signs of forswearing violence.

Virtually a library in itself, Stanton Evans' book provides de tailed histories of all the impor tant East-West confrontations since 1945. In its pages you can find all you need to know about the Bay of Pigs, the Cuban mis sile crisis, the Dominican Republic affair, the war in Katanga, the Diem murder, the partition of Laos, and the communist drives in Africa. This is a "must" book for anyone who wants to know the world of 1967. ~ ~ 1787: THE GRAND CONVEN TION by Clinton Rossiter (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1966) $7.95, 443 pp. Reviewed by Robert M. Thornton THIS is a fine handbook for any one interested in the making of our Constitution. The information about the framers, like the docu ments in the appendices, is, of course, helpful, but the most valu able passages in the book are those devoted to the leading ideas in the air during the summer of 1787. As another reviewer, M. Stanton Evans, has remarked, one could hardly ask for a better expression of the "key ideas in the consensus Isn't it time you really startedgetting ALL THE NEWS THAT'S FIT TO PRINT?

M ore and more Americansare becomingalarmed about the "Truth Gap." They are tired of Gov ernment newsmanagers and liberal opinionators deciding what qualifiesas "all the news that'sfit to print." That's why more than 300,000 concerned Americans have turned to HUMAN EVENTS: the hard-hittingInsideWashingtonReport that specializesin ~-managed news. SPECIAL FREE BONUS OFFER T ry HUMAN EVENTS now. Our no-risk trial of fer entitles you to receive 13 fact·filledissues for just$2.98...,-asaving of $1.57 off the per-copy price! Plus a FREE BONUS copy of our Special Report on LBJ's scandal·ridden"War on Poverty." Don'tmiss this shocking16-pageexpose! REFUND GUARANTEE: If you should decide to cancel, let us know and we'll refund the remaining portion of your subscription. But the FREE BONUS is yours to keep howeveryou decide. r--------~,HUMAN EVENTS • 410 FirstStreet,S.E. Washington,D.C. 20003 Check Term: o 13 weeks for just $2.98, plus FREE BONUS copy of the "War on Pove}~ty" report.

(REFUND GUARANTEED) o Paymentenclosed* 0 Bill me later *Thank you. We'lladd 2 extra issues FREE! Name _ (PleasePrint) Address _ City _ State_~ ZIP _ 1.- -1 64 THE FREEMAN January of political thought in the new re public" than appears on pages 60 64. As is well known, the Constitu tion is a "bundle of compromises." While most of the delegates to the Convention wished to build a new nation, shared the goal of "or dered liberty," and agreed as to the general form of government best for Americans, theirdeliber ations represented a clash of in terests, each one jealous of powers granted to the others. But the framers, although representing op posing interests, never suggested resolving their differences by an appeal to arms. Nor did they ex press any desire to bring about unity in the form of a dictator ship. Most of these men had ear lier risked their lives, their for tunes, and their sacred honor for the cause of liberty, and they wanted nothing to do with any form of despotism, either dictator ial or democratic.

Vital to success was the privacy of the convention's proceedings. In our age of "instant publicity" it is difficult to imagine such an event taking place with hardly any leaks of information by the par ticipants and little pressure from outsiders to learn what was tak ing place behind closed doors in the State House (Independence Hall) in Philadelphia. In the glare of publicity such as we have today, the necessary frankness in debate and the flexibility to compromise '\\70uld have been impossible. The framers, although not with out confidence in their abilities and in the use of reason tested by years of political experience, did, nevertheless, hold to a humble view of their limitations. Their goal was not a perfect society but a tolerable one. They did not deny the shortcomings of their finished work but asked its critics if a sec ond convention could produce any thing better that would be accept able to the people of the several states.

Although these men deliberated in privacy, the fruit.of their la bors had to be submitted to the people for approval and then, if accepted, it would have to prove itself in actual use. The framers did not intend their document to be a lecture room exercise in polit ical theory; they aimed to produce a Constitution which would work. Throughout the book Rossiter challenges those who have accused the framers of acting solely fron1 selfish motives or of bringing off a bloodless counterrevolution. On the contrary, the fifty or so men who labored from May to Septem ber, 1787, were disinterested to a remarkable degree and their splendid efforts represented a nec essary and proper culmination of what had begun in 1774-1776. ~ THE FREEMAN FEBRUARY 1967 Vol. 17 No.2 Y' A serious problem, suggests Gary North, stems from the fact that a policy of domestic inflation results in an irredeemable money unacceptable for settling balances due in international trade p. 67 Y' Henry Hazlitt further pursues the monetary question through the impli cations of price controls, antitrust pol icies, and other interventions, to the conclusion that an unhampered mar ket best finds the right price ...... p. 73 1;1' Some fishermen may be surprised to discover, with Professor Carson's help; that men, too, can be baited and hooked' on promises of something for nothing p. 83 Y' Judge William· Palmer, long devoted to the defense of property as the key to human rights, traces the history of private property over the centuries and points up the seriousness of modern invasions of privacy...... ....... p. 92 Y' Is it the duty of the government to reveal, or the obligation of citizens to find out and understand, what the gov ernors are doing to the governed?