Reader's Forum

I shouldn't have to write the next paragraph, but I will anyway because I want your readers to know I am not a person who is afraid to see nonwhite immigrants enter this country. My wife and I sponsored two Vietnamese families 12 years ago. This included bringing them into our home, food, money, clothing, buying them an auto and training them to drive it and finding jobs for them. Most of six months was spent getting these families on their feet. We're glad we did it and today "our" families are doing well and an asset to America. But "open borders" won't work because of the social welfare system in place in the United States. Not all illegal aliens come to America for liberty and a job. The United States provides such stunning in centives as free school, free lunch, food stamps, free health care, subsidized housing, unemployment compensation, Aid to Families with Dependent Children and many other freebies. The total package, even for an alien without a job, could well be many times what he could earn at home. And don't believe for a minute that the "invisible hand" of the free market would cause them to move on or go home if they didn't find a job here. Being ra tional they would recognize that the cost of de parting would be too great. It's just too good a deal. That's why 88% of recently arrived ref ugees (first 31 months) in California are currently on some kind of county, state or federal welfare.

Cancel the welfare and then we can open the borders. Immigrants will then come to America for liberty and opportunity as they did a hundred years ago. -William F. Kerschner Elm Grove, Wisconsin Professor Shannon replies: I have no problem at all with Mr. Kerschner's argument that it is not desirable for us to have aliens flock here in order to become free loaders on our welfare and social service systems. By all means, let's make such people ineligible for these programs! In practice, however, this may be difficult or impossible to accomplish. So, as an economist, I must ask: do the overall benefits of open im migration outweigh these (and other) costs. Several studies indicate that, indeed, the ben efits do predominate. For more details, I rec ommend again reading the article entitled "What about Immigration?" written by Julian L. Simon which appeared in The Freeman for January 1986.

Finally, let me point out that the new immi gration law, which now penalizes employers for hiring improperly documented aliens, has the regrettable feature of excluding immigrants who truly want to work. At the very least, we should hasten to tear down this portion of our wall. -Russell Shannon Clemson, South Carolina 203 Property Rights and Eminent Domain by John Hospers E llen Frankel Paul's Property Rights and Eminent Domain is an exemplary work of both historical scholarship and cre ative thought. It is a valuable historical and critical survey of dozens of U.S. court deci sions involving property rights, and at the same time a philosophical defense of a theory of nat ural rights in property. A long historical chapter, which occupies more than 100 pages, considers two legal con cepts-eminent domain and police power which between them have produced a devas tating erosion of property rights in America.