The Jonestown Syndrome; H. Watkins

It was perhaps 25 or 30 years ago that we heard of another leader who called himself "Father Divine," a blasphemous name. But there seemed to be plenty of people flock ing to the "heavens" of this self-styled deity. He had "heavens" in several large cities in the United States, and The Reverend Mr. Watkins edits and publishes The Printed Preacher, a monthly gospel message, 303 North Third, Dayton, Washington 99328. A1f\ when he wanted to open another one he was able to pay hundreds of thou sands of dollars in currency, not checks. Sun Myung Moon, a Korean min ister, has come to America and re cruited hundreds of its young people for his cause. They commit them selves to him, live in his communes and work long hours every day to raise the millions of dollars which his projects require; and he, like all such leaders, lives in opulence. In the early part of the past cen tury Robert Owen established a commune in the Ohio valley. His glowing praises of socialism so in fected people that many of them left their normal pursuits and joined his enterprise, for a while.

In July 1981 an Indian guru call ing himself Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh paid $6 million for 100 square miles of Oregon about 180 miles from THE JONESTOWN SYNDROME 411 where I live. He and 200 disciples have applied for a city charter in the middle of the spread, and they are calling the town Rajneeshpuram. His followers, who called themselves sanyassins, don't have to turn all their property and pensions over to him, but most of them do. This al lows him to live in plush style which includes a Rolls-Royce, a convey ance that more or less stands out on the country roads of that part of Or egon. Why the Submission? History would supply us with many such efforts at communalliv ing or socialism. The feudal lords and their serfs were actually one variety of the same concept, and as we look back to those medieval days we wonder why anyone would be part of such a thing. Earlier in this essay we wondered how a man could get such control over people that they would submit themselves so totally to his will. But I think a better question is: Why do people allow themselves to be con trolled by one who exercises such to talitarian authority? Why do they surrender freedom of thought and movement to him? Even a hypnotist can't function unless his subject is willing to open his mind to the sug gestions of another.

First, there has to be the promise of something to be gained. No sane person will surrender himself to the authority of another unless he gets something in return. He either gets it immediately or he believes almost beyond doubt th{lt he will get it, on down the road. i In an economy of freedom of exchal\lge, trades are made because each one is willing to trade something for so;mething else which he values more highly. In the com munal example we have cited it is quite obvious that the person who elects to come under the total au thority of a Jim iJones is interested in security. Everybody wants material secu rity. No one lik¢s to live on the fi nancial edge of uothing. Most of us try to figure out! ways of saving up for the rainy dny when we can't produce the daily necessities. Banks are able to stay in business because their depositors ientrust their "nest eggs" in anticipation of a day when they can no longer work for salary or wages. This was the selling point in the '30s when '~social security" was sold to the American people.

Part of the Jonestown syndrome is the deep-seated desire for security, and there seems to be no shortage of people who are willing to surrender minds and freedom of movement in exchange for such security. Jones promised it; so did Father Divine. Moon holds out this carrot to his fol lowers, and the Indian guru does the same for his devotees. Perhaps you are thinking, "Well, this is all very interesting, but-af412 THE FREEMAN July tel' all-he is talking about a tiny percentage of the total population. Why get stirred t;lp about it? Let them do their own thing." True, the ex amples cited are minuscule com p«iiredto the whole of society, but they are actually an exaggeration of a more widespread symptom. Millions (?f Americans who are not in com munes have an overpowering desire for security,. and this desire shows itself on several fronts. 'Why do people join labor unions voluntarily?" They think by so doing they gainjob security, a pension plan, or a guaranteed annual wage. To get these benefits(?) they have to give something in exchange: part of their freedoll), their union dues and some of their intellectual integrity. Mil lions are apparently willing to pay such a price.

Why do so many defend the mini ... mum wage? Their answer? "Why, anyone who is worth anything at all is worth $3.50 an hourI'"'As it turns out, there are thousands of potential workers, especially among the young, who are worth nothing in the job market. They aren't worth $3.50, and no one is allowed to hire them for less; therefo~e, they are worth noth ... ing. This time it is a matter of wage scale security. r:rheyhave little or no concern for young people entering the job market, hut rather they want a floor under their own pay scale, hence the minimum wage laws. They set a price on a certain commodity (unskilled labor) which no one is will ing to pay. And all this results from a misguided lust for security. Shifting th~ Responsibility Another symptom of·· the Jones town syndrome, one that is interre ... lated with the above, is the desire to shift responsibility onto others. In this case I prefer the word unrespon sible rather than ilTesponsible. The same attitude is quite dominant in nursing homes among those who could take care of themselves but would rather not.

In the promotional pitch of the commune in Oregon which is run by the Indian guru is the line, "It is a place where people may live their lives. according to their own vision." Translation: "Do as you please." But the Associated Press investigative reporter arrived at a different con clusion from examining some of the 200 to 300 books supposedly written by the guru: "His philosophy is based on total loss of individual ego and no restrictions on individual actions." Obviously the Indian mystic has stumbled onto a good thing. By means of nearly total control of the minds and lives of his s\lbjects he is enabled to live on a very affluent level. How does this relate to our coun try as a whole? Uncomfortably well. Too many of your fellow citizens suf fer from the same mind set. "I don't care what kind of government we 1982 THE JONESTOWN SYNDROME 413 have, whether the people in author ity are virtuous or corrupt, or if the currency is stable or inflated. I'm not concerned about national defense or foreign relations. Just give me enough to eat, a color TV and a can of beer." Just what approach do you suppose a smart, opportunistic can didate will make to your unrespon sible neighbor? One guess is all you get on this one.

"Utopia now" is part of the Jones town syndrome. But the message of the New Testament is that this life on earth is not a utopia; it is not heaven. In this life we are pilgrims journeying toward something better than anyone has ever known, and Jesus came to show the way. The philosophy of delayed gratification has always been embraced by the people of God. The Serpent in the Garden of Eden said, in effect, "You don't have to wait; you can have it now!" Be your own god, and write your own rules. The same Serpent came to Jesus on the mount of temp tatioo: "Just bow down and worship me and you can have it all!" Leo N. Tolstoy Changingour Minds There is an; inherent problem in the Jonestown 'Syndrome. In order to become a victiJin,one must virtually quit thinking! or have his mental computer reprbgrammed with gar bage. Evidently the intellectual cli mate of our beloved land is ripe for this social malaise. Colleges and universities h~ve been preparing us for it. The "public" school, so sacred in the minds ot so many, is the Tro jan Horse within our midst. The powerful med~a are generally ori ented in the same direction. Basi cally our brains are as good as they have ever bee~, but if we fill them with misinforrpation we will inevi tably draw wrong conclusions.

The solution.? Somehow, as Leon ard Read tells I us, we must develop an elite, an aristocracy of morally and intellectUtally sound thinkers who can captu.te the attention of the youth and turn it to truth and integ rity. Ideas certainly have conse quences-wheJ;l they are assimi lated into the rPinds of thinkers, and translated into appropriate action. ® aDEAS ON UBERTY ONE FREE MAN will say with truth what he tijinks and feels amongst thousands of men who by their acts and wordsi attest exactly the oppo site. It would seem that he who sincerely expressed his thought must remain alone, whereas it generally happens tl~at everyone else, or the majority at least, have been thinking and feeling the same things but without expressing them.