The Liberty Archive FREECAPITALISTS.ORG

Illustrated Episode · Volume I, chapter 49 · February 1682

Danforth calls it treason

A tall old man in black stands alone on a plank floor, arm outstretched, speaking to rows of seated men in dark coats in a plain timber room lit by small grey windows; some wave him down and some glare.
Boston, winter 1682. In the General Court, Deputy Governor Thomas Danforth stands almost alone and charges the ministers who want agents sent to the king with treason and betrayal of the colony's liberty. Men on the benches scoff and wave him down, and the Court votes for the agents anyway. Rothbard calls it the critical turn, and Danforth's warning came true. Chapter 49 of Conceived in Liberty.

Download the painting, full size (JPEG)CC BY 4.0

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0: credit freecapitalists.org. How to credit.

Adapted from Murray N. Rothbard, Conceived in Liberty (Mises Institute, 2011), CC BY 3.0.

What happened

In February 1682 the General Court of Massachusetts heard a letter from Charles II read aloud, carried over by Edward Randolph, the customs collector. The King ordered the colony to send agents to London with power to submit to whatever changes the Crown chose to make. The Court split. Governor Simon Bradstreet, William Stoughton and Joseph Dudley were for sending them. Deputy Governor Thomas Danforth, fifty-eight years old, led the men who were not, and he did not mince words. Rothbard writes that Danforth argued at length the vital importance of taking a stand right there, that agents sent to bargain would bargain away the country's liberties, and that "almost single-handed and alone" he charged the ministers pressing for submission with treason and betrayal of their liberty (CiL, pp. 358-359). Stoughton and Bradstreet denounced him for going too far, and the room scoffed at him as an extremist. On 20 March the Court voted to send agents, Dudley and John Richards, by a close vote. They sailed without power to defend the charter. In London the Lords of Trade demanded that the colony hand over the power to revise its charter or lose it, and Rothbard says Danforth's gloomy prophecy was coming true (p. 360). The Crown moved to void the charter, exactly as the old man had warned.

Sources

  1. Murray N. Rothbard, Conceived in Liberty (Auburn, Ala.: Mises Institute, 2011 single-volume ed.), vol. I, ch. 49, pp. 357-362. CC BY 3.0. Rothbard
  2. Nathaniel B. Shurtleff, ed., Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England, vol. V, 1674-1686 (Boston, 1854): pp. 332-333 (third session, 15 February 1681/2, the King's letter read) and p. 346 (20 March 1681/2, vote for agents). Primary source
  3. Thomas Hutchinson, The History of the Colony of Massachusets-Bay, vol. I (Boston, 1764; the 1765 printing at archive.org), pp. 331-336: the two parties in the government and the choice of agents in February 1681. Secondary source
  4. 'Old State House (Boston)', Wikipedia (accessed 2026-09-29): the wooden Town House of 1657, with the General Court's chamber on the second floor, burned in 1711; the brick building dates from 1713. Secondary source
  5. David Hackett Fischer, Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), 'Massachusetts Dress Ways'. Secondary source
  6. New England Historical Society, 'The Puritan Dress Code and the Outrage of Slashed Sleeves' (accessed 2026-09-29). Secondary source