The Liberty Archive FREECAPITALISTS.ORG

Illustrated Episode · Volume I, chapter 42 · 2 September 1664

Torn to bits, read anyway

In a plain council room, a stern man in black with a wooden leg flings torn paper to the floor while burgomasters draw back and a young man stoops to gather the scraps.
Fort Amsterdam, 2 September 1664. English ships lie in the bay, and Colonel Nicolls has sent mild terms. When his burgomasters ask that the letter be read to the people, Peter Stuyvesant tears it to pieces. Nicholas Bayard, a clerk of twenty, gathers the scraps and pieces it back together. Rothbard says the Dutch valued their lives and liberties above a remote patriotism. Chapter 42 of Conceived in Liberty.

Download the painting, full size (JPEG)CC BY 4.0

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0: credit freecapitalists.org. How to credit.

Adapted from Murray N. Rothbard, Conceived in Liberty (Mises Institute, 2011), CC BY 3.0.

What happened

At the end of August 1664 an English fleet carrying a thousand men anchored off New Amsterdam, against Stuyvesant's 150 soldiers and 250 citizens under arms, and Colonel Richard Nicolls demanded the town. On Tuesday morning, 2 September, Governor John Winthrop of Connecticut came ashore with a letter from Nicolls promising that the Dutch could keep their trade and come and settle freely under the English king. Director General Peter Stuyvesant opened it before his council and the burgomasters in the fort. They wanted it read to the people gathering outside, and he refused. Fiske writes that he "flew into a rage and tore the letter into small pieces." Several magistrates walked out in offense. Nicholas Bayard, a clerk of twenty, gathered the fragments, pieced them together and made a true copy. The workmen left the palisades, hurried to the Stadt-Huys and demanded the letter, and Stuyvesant gave way. The copy was read out, the people called for surrender, and Stuyvesant's own son signed the remonstrance asking him to yield. On 7 September he surrendered New Amsterdam without a fight. Rothbard writes that the people "were intelligent enough to regard their lives and liberties more highly than they did a remote and artificial patriotism" (CiL, p. 313). After a generation of Company rule under Kieft and Stuyvesant, they were offered liberty by the enemy at the gate, and they took it.

Sources

  1. Murray N. Rothbard, Conceived in Liberty (Auburn, Ala.: Mises Institute, 2011 single-volume ed.), vol. I, ch. 42, pp. 311-320. CC BY 3.0. Rothbard
  2. John Fiske, The Dutch and Quaker Colonies in America, vol. II (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1899), ch. 9, pp. 250-251 (the letter and its tearing), read on the Thayer/LacusCurtius transcription. Secondary source
  3. John Romeyn Brodhead, History of the State of New York, vol. I (New York: Harper, 1853), pp. 738-742 (the surrender of New Amsterdam, with citations to the Dutch and English records). Secondary source
  4. 'Peter Stuyvesant', Wikipedia (accessed 2026-09-29): birth year uncertain, loss of his right leg at Saint Martin in April 1644, the silver-studded wooden leg, the Couturier portrait attribution. Secondary source
  5. '1600-1650 in Western European fashion', Wikipedia (accessed 2026-09-29), 1640s Netherlands sections. Secondary source