The Liberty Archive FREECAPITALISTS.ORG
Companion menu

Conceived in Liberty Companion · Volume I, chapter 22 · 8 November 1637

Anne Hutchinson before the General Court · The thatched meetinghouse at Newtown (now Cambridge), Massachusetts Bay

The court knows wherefore

What happens to a fair hearing when the governing body also judges its own critics?

A pale woman in a dark gown and white coif stands alone on a plank floor before a grave man in black who raises a hand to silence her, while rows of seated men in black watch from the benches.
Modern AI-assisted reconstruction. Newtown, Massachusetts, November 1637. Anne Hutchinson stands alone before Governor Winthrop and the General Court, which has just voted to banish her, and asks one thing: wherefore? Winthrop answers, “Say no more, the court knows wherefore and is satisfied.” Rothbard’s point is that the court felt no need to justify itself before reason, natural justice or the public, and refused her any answer. Chapter 22 of Conceived in Liberty.

Before this scene

Anne Hutchinson attracted followers in Massachusetts Bay through her religious teaching. Rothbard connects the campaign against her to the defeat of her allies in the colony’s election of 1637. The General Court combined legislative and judicial authority: the same institution made rules and heard cases. In November it examined Hutchinson and ordered her banished. This was a civil proceeding, distinct from the church proceeding that followed. The surviving examination record should be read alongside Rothbard’s account, because their descriptions of the grounds differ. [1] [2]

Download image

Rothbard’s account

From Conceived in Liberty, chapter 22, pp. 180–183 (2011 edition). Every sentence here comes from Rothbard’s text; the words in quotation marks are his.

Rothbard says Anne Hutchinson’s heresy shook Massachusetts largely because she “occupied a high place in the colony’s oligarchy” and won converts with “rapid and sweeping success” (p. 180). After the Winthrop forces won the May 1637 election by moving it to Newtown, Vane’s defeat “spelled swift suppression for the antinomian heretics” (p. 181). Having “vented their fury on the major followers and isolated the leader,” the oligarchs reached “the culminating point of the drama: the trial and persecution of Anne Hutchinson herself” (p. 181).

“There was no independent judiciary in the colonies”: the legislature, the General Court, was also the highest court (p. 181). In November 1637 her enemies on that court duly “tried” her, convicted her of sedition and contempt, and banished her (p. 182). Only two members dissented, and when Winthrop pronounced sentence she “courageously” asked: “I desire to know wherefore I am banished” (p. 182). Winthrop “refused to answer”: “Say no more. The court knows wherefore, and is satisfied” (p. 182). Rothbard’s verdict: “It was apparently enough for the court to be satisfied; no justification before the bar of reason, natural justice, or the public was deemed necessary” (p. 182).

“Spared banishment during the rugged winter, she was imprisoned at the home of one of her major enemies” (pp. 182-183). At her church trial in March even John Cotton “turned on her savagely,” but she had the last word: “Better to be cast out of the Church than to deny Christ” (pp. 182-183). In April, “ill and exhausted,” she joined her husband at Aquidneck (pp. 182-183).

The fuller story, beyond Conceived in Liberty

Not from Rothbard. Drawn from the other sources below; the numbers are those sources.

Winthrop’s journal has the General Court assembling on 2 November 1637.3 Her examination opened on 7 November in a thatched-roof meetinghouse, where the nine magistrates and thirty-one deputies of the court sat on backless wooden benches.4 At one point she seemed ready to collapse, and a chair was called for.4 When she said she saw the truth “by an immediate revelation” from God, Deputy Governor Dudley announced, “I am now fully persuaded that Mrs. Hutchinson is deluded by the Devil.”4 John Cotton was not among the two judges who voted against banishing her, and one minister abstained.4

The examination record never names sedition or contempt: Winthrop gave the court’s grounds as “the troublesomeness of her spirit and the danger of her course amongst us,” and the sentence called her “a woman not fit for our society.”2‡ The court’s record has Winthrop answering her question, “I desire to know wherefore I am banished?”, with “Say no more, the court knows wherefore and is satisfied.”2

Winthrop wrote that “because it was winter, they committed her to a private house,” which Famous Trials places in Roxbury.34 On 1 April 1638 she began a six-day walk south to Providence Plantation, where she boarded a ship for Aquidneck.4

Why it matters

Interpretation: The case invites scrutiny of how political rivalry, religious disagreement, and judicial power interact. A conclusion about fairness should use the recorded proceedings, not the painted expressions of the participants. [1] [2]

Examine and discuss

  1. What different powers did the General Court combine?
  2. What does the examination record establish about the grounds for banishment, and how does that differ from Rothbard’s description?
  3. Compare Hutchinson’s hearing with Williams’s flight: which choices were available to each dissenter?

Where the record differs from Rothbard

Errata notes. Rothbard’s text and his account above are left as he wrote them. Every erratum.

Conceived in Liberty, p. 182
Rothbard says Her enemies on the General Court duly “tried” her, “convicted her of sedition and contempt,” and banished her.
The evidence The examination record names no offense called sedition or contempt (those were the grounds on which the court had convicted Wheelwright in March 1637). Winthrop gave the court’s grounds as “the troublesomeness of her spirit and the danger of her course amongst us,” and the sentence banished her “as being a woman not fit for our society.” The Famous Trials account says the court was less than clear about the crime.
Source “The Examination of Mrs. Anne Hutchinson at the Court at Newtown,” November 1637, transcription at Famous Trials (UMKC); Famous Trials, “The Trial of Anne Hutchinson (1637): An Account” (both accessed 2026-10-02)

About the reconstruction

This is an AI-assisted adaptive companion inspired by Murray N. Rothbard’s Conceived in Liberty. It draws on sources beyond the book and is not Rothbard’s original text or a condensation of it. Each scene identifies whether its narration combines sources or separates an account of the book from additional context.

The sources establish the event and accounts of it. The painting’s poses, expressions, lighting, and arrangement are artistic choices rather than a surviving visual record.

Suggest a correction to this companion scene. Notes about the original book are recorded separately.

Full sources and reuse information

Sources

  1. Murray N. Rothbard, Conceived in Liberty (Auburn, Ala.: Mises Institute, 2011 single-volume ed.), vol. I, ch. 22, pp. 180-186. CC BY 3.0. Rothbard
  2. ‘The Examination of Mrs. Anne Hutchinson at the Court at Newtown’, November 1637, transcription at Famous Trials, University of Missouri-Kansas City (accessed 2026-09-29); the contemporary record printed in David D. Hall, ed., The Antinomian Controversy, 1636-1638: A Documentary History (1968). Primary source
  3. John Winthrop, Winthrop’s Journal, ‘History of New England,’ 1630-1649, ed. James Kendall Hosmer, vol. I (New York: Scribner’s, 1908), pp. 239-241 (the court of 2 November 1637 and its proceedings against Wheelwright and Mrs. Hutchinson). Primary source
  4. ‘The Trial of Anne Hutchinson (1637): An Account’, Famous Trials, University of Missouri-Kansas City (accessed 2026-09-29): dates, the thatched meetinghouse at Newtown, nine magistrates and thirty-one deputies, the chair called for. Secondary source
  5. ‘Anne Hutchinson’, Wikipedia (accessed 2026-09-29): baptized 20 July 1591, aged 46 at the trial of November 1637, the trial opened 7 November. Secondary source
  6. David Hackett Fischer, Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), ‘Massachusetts Dress Ways’. Secondary source

Download the painting, full size (JPEG)

Painting and companion additions: CC BY 4.0, credit freecapitalists.org. How to credit.

Adapted from Murray N. Rothbard, Conceived in Liberty (Mises Institute, 2011), CC BY 3.0. External sources retain their own terms.

Explore this scene in context

Return to browsing · Companion overview