The Liberty Archive FREECAPITALISTS.ORG
Companion menu

Conceived in Liberty Companion · Volume III, chapter 56 · 16 December 1773

Boston protesters destroy East India Company tea · Griffin's Wharf, Boston, beside the ship Dartmouth

The monopoly’s tea hits the mud

When legal authority and local opposition collide, who can decide what happens to a cargo?

Content note: The scene depicts colonists using disguises associated with Native people. The exact identification of those disguises differs across the cited accounts; the picture does not document Native participation.

From low on the mud beside a ship’s dark hull, men with blackened faces and blankets tip a split chest over the rail, tea pouring onto a heap of leaves and broken boards where bare-armed youths beat it with staves. Torchlit onlookers line the wharf.
Modern AI-assisted reconstruction. Griffin’s Wharf, Boston, the night of December 16, 1773. Men with sooty faces and blankets split East India Company chests and pour the tea over the Dartmouth’s rail. Down on the low-tide mud, apprentices beat it in with staves. To Rothbard the Tea Act was a rescue of the near-bankrupt East India Company that carried its monopoly to American shores. Chapter 56 of Conceived in Liberty.

Before this scene

The Tea Act of 1773 supported the East India Company, a trading company with government privileges. Rothbard emphasizes opposition to its monopoly, an exclusive commercial position protected by government, rather than treating the dispute solely as a tax protest. In Boston, opponents demanded that its tea be sent back without paying duty. Governor Thomas Hutchinson insisted the ships remain until payment. With customs seizure approaching, the dispute moved from meetings and demands to destruction of the cargo on 16 December. [1] [2] [4] [5] [7]

Download image

Rothbard’s account

From Conceived in Liberty, chapter 56, pp. 1026–1032 (2011 edition). Every sentence here comes from Rothbard’s text; the words in quotation marks are his.

Rothbard reads the Tea Act of May 1773 as a rescue, meant “to relieve the affairs of the East India Company and save it from imminent bankruptcy” (p. 1026). “The deed that alarmed and provoked the Americans,” he writes, was not the old duty but the move “to extend the hated and feared East Indian monopoly to American shores” (p. 1026). He rejects the charge of mere self-interest: “Opposition to a governmentally privileged monopoly is itself a high principle” (p. 1027).

In August 1773 the company moved to “invade the American market,” and the merchants of the four ports and their backers chose the weapon that had beaten the stamps: “revolutionary mob violence or the threat thereof” (p. 1029). It came to a head in Boston under “the flint-hearted Tory Thomas Hutchinson,” whose published letters had made him “more intransigent than ever,” and whose consignee sons and nephew gave him an interest that “simply strengthened his Tory resolve” (pp. 1029-1030). Where other officials looked the other way, he “resolved to back the consignees to the hilt” (p. 1030). The consignees would not resign, the “body” meeting demanded the tea go back untaxed, and Hutchinson kept the ships in port until duty was paid (p. 1030). After twenty days customs could seize the ships, and the rebels feared officers would “land it, sell it secretly to the people, and use the money to pay the salaries of the appointed officials” (p. 1031). On December 16, the last chance, Sam Adams gave the signal: “This meeting can do nothing more to save the country” (p. 1031).

“A remarkably disciplined ginger group of Sons of Liberty, disguised as Mohawk Indians,” spent hours “dumping every bit of East India tea into Boston harbor” (p. 1031). “No other property and no person was at all harmed,” Rothbard writes, and the band ran “from leading merchants to farmers, carpenters, and blacksmiths” (p. 1031). No Americans “would help to track down the culprits” (p. 1031). Many Massachusetts towns backed the Tea Party, many now denying Parliament’s rights “to legislate for and to tax the colonies” (p. 1032).

The fuller story, beyond Conceived in Liberty

Not from Rothbard. Drawn from the other sources below; the numbers are those sources.

The Dartmouth’s log puts the boarding between six and seven, and Andrews wrote that before nine every chest on the three ships had been knocked to pieces and flung over the sides.25 Thatcher’s Traits records Purkitt and Dolbear on the flats beside one of the vessels at nearly low tide, beating up boxes and tea with tools made of a stave.4

Hewes remembered painting his face and hands with coal dust in a blacksmith’s shop.3 Wyeth remembered ragged clothes and faces smeared with grease and lamp black or soot, and Andrews wrote that the men wore blankets, with their heads muffled and “copper-colored countenances.”57 Where Rothbard writes “Mohawk Indians,” Wyeth wrote of men “dressing to resemble Indians as much as possible,” and Andrews heard them called Indians from Narragansett.57‡ The Dartmouth’s log counted about a thousand people on the wharf, and Sessions remembered them standing silent.27 Carp writes that Samuel Adams, John Hancock and Joseph Warren stayed at the Old South Meeting House, well away from the wharf.10

Carp writes that the carpenter John Crane was knocked senseless in a hold when a hoist gave way.10‡ Hewes remembered that Charles O’Conner of Charlestown, caught pocketing tea, was stripped of his coat and kicked.3‡ The Massachusetts Gazette counted three hundred and forty-two chests broken up in three hours, and the East India Company later claimed 9,659 pounds 6s 4d for 340.68 When the tide rose, the Gazette reported, it floated the broken chests and tea all the way from the town to Dorchester Neck.6

Why it matters

Interpretation: This confrontation shifts the question from participation within colonial institutions to resistance against imperial authority. A judgment about the destruction should distinguish the protesters’ aims, the property affected, and the alternatives they faced. [1] [2] [4] [5] [7]

Examine and discuss

  1. Why does Rothbard emphasize the company’s commercial privileges?
  2. Which decisions prevented the ships from simply departing?
  3. Compare the demand for a voice in Virginia’s assembly with this challenge to imperial authority: what kind of consent is at issue in each?

Where the record differs from Rothbard

Errata notes. Rothbard’s text and his account above are left as he wrote them. Every erratum.

Conceived in Liberty, p. 1031
Rothbard says At the Boston Tea Party “no other property and no person was at all harmed.”
The evidence Two people were hurt: carpenter John Crane was knocked senseless when a hoist gave way, and Charles O’Conner of Charlestown, caught pocketing tea, was stripped of his coat and kicked. No one died; the ships and other cargo were untouched.
Source Carp, *Defiance of the Patriots*, ch. 6; Hawkes, p. 40; Andrews in Drake, *Tea Leaves*, p. LXX
Conceived in Liberty, p. 1031
Rothbard says The Sons of Liberty were “disguised as Mohawk Indians.”
The evidence The participants and contemporaries read here describe a crude disguise meant to look like Indians in general. Wyeth wrote of ragged clothes, faces smeared with grease and lamp black or soot, and “dressing to resemble Indians as much as possible”; Hewes blackened his face and hands with coal dust; Andrews wrote of blankets, muffled heads and “copper-colored countenances,” and heard the men called Indians from Narragansett. None of these three names the Mohawk.
Source Wyeth (1827) and Andrews (18 Dec 1773) in Francis S. Drake, Tea Leaves (1884), pp. LXX-LXXI; Hewes in Hawkes (1834), p. 38

About the reconstruction

This is an AI-assisted adaptive companion inspired by Murray N. Rothbard’s Conceived in Liberty. It draws on sources beyond the book and is not Rothbard’s original text or a condensation of it. Each scene identifies whether its narration combines sources or separates an account of the book from additional context.

The sources establish the event and accounts of it. The painting’s poses, expressions, lighting, and arrangement are artistic choices rather than a surviving visual record.

Details to notice

  1. Tea falls from an opened chest over the ship’s side. The destruction of the cargo is documented; the exact placement and gestures of these figures are reconstructed.
  2. Men on the flats break up floating boxes with long tools. This follows a recollection recorded by Thatcher; the painting supplies the figures’ arrangement and faces.
  3. A crowd watches from the wharf while firelight illuminates the workers. Accounts support spectators on the wharf, but this composition and lighting are artistic choices.

Suggest a correction to this companion scene. Notes about the original book are recorded separately.

Full sources and reuse information

Sources

  1. Murray N. Rothbard, Conceived in Liberty (Auburn, AL: Mises Institute, 2011 single-volume ed.), Vol. III, ch. 55 ‘Tea Launches the Final Crisis’, pp. 1024-1028, and ch. 56 ‘The Boston Tea Party’, pp. 1029-1032. CC BY 3.0. Rothbard
  2. Log of the ship Dartmouth, 28 Nov to 16 Dec 1773, printed in Benjamin B. Thatcher, Traits of the Tea Party (New York, 1835), Appendix, pp. 259-261. Primary source
  3. James Hawkes, A Retrospect of the Boston Tea-Party, with a Memoir of George R. T. Hewes (New York: S. S. Bliss, 1834), pp. 6, 36-41. Hewes’s recollection sixty years on. Primary source
  4. Benjamin Bussey Thatcher, Traits of the Tea Party; being a Memoir of George R. T. Hewes (New York: Harper, 1835), pp. 179-186 and Appendix pp. 259-265 (Hewes, Purkitt, Hooton, Sprague and others, recalled in 1835). Primary source
  5. John Andrews to William Barrell, Boston, 18 Dec 1773, printed in Drake, Tea Leaves (1884), pp. LXIX-LXX. Primary source
  6. Massachusetts Gazette and Boston News-Letter, 23 Dec 1773, account of the destruction of the tea, printed in Drake, Tea Leaves (1884), p. LXVIII; with the Boston Evening-Post of 20 Dec 1773, p. LXIX. Primary source
  7. Recollections of Joshua Wyeth (1827), Benjamin Simpson (1830), Peter Edes (1836), Ebenezer Stevens and Robert Sessions, printed in Drake, Tea Leaves (1884), pp. LXXI-LXXX. Late reminiscences; used for physical detail where they agree. Primary source
  8. East India Company to the Earl of Dartmouth, request for compensation, 16 Feb 1774, The National Archives (UK), CO 5/247 (340 chests; 9,659 pounds 6s 4d). Primary source
  9. Francis S. Drake, Tea Leaves: being a collection of letters and documents relating to the shipment of tea to the American colonies in the year 1773 (Boston: A. O. Crane, 1884), Introduction pp. LXIII-LXXXIII. Secondary source
  10. Benjamin L. Carp, Defiance of the Patriots: The Boston Tea Party and the Making of America (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010), ch. 2, ch. 5 ‘The Detestable Tea Arrives’, ch. 6 ‘The Destroyers at Griffin’s Wharf’. Read through Google Books search-inside. Secondary source
  11. Fred Espenak, Six Millennium Catalog of Phases of the Moon, 1701 to 1800, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; moon altitude and set computed with PyEphem for Boston, 2026-09-29. Secondary source
  12. National Park Service, ‘Boston Tea Party in Real Time’ (updated 20 Dec 2023). Secondary source
  13. Nathaniel Currier, The Destruction of Tea at Boston Harbor, hand-colored lithograph (New York, 1846), Library of Congress LC-DIG-pga-08593. The famous image this Episode must not recompose. The LOC item page (loc.gov item 91795889) sits behind a bot challenge, so the Wayback snapshot of 2025-11-30 is cited. Secondary source

Download the painting, full size (JPEG)

Painting and companion additions: CC BY 4.0, credit freecapitalists.org. How to credit.

Adapted from Murray N. Rothbard, Conceived in Liberty (Mises Institute, 2011), CC BY 3.0. External sources retain their own terms.

Explore this scene in context

Return to browsing · Companion overview