The Liberty Archive FREECAPITALISTS.ORG

Illustrated Episode · Volume II, chapter 27 · 4 August 1735

Three huzzas in the hall

In a packed courtroom, men swing hats and raise their arms as a pale printer grips the bar beside a grave, grey-wigged lawyer, with a stern judge in a white wig watching from the raised bench and jurors standing at left.
New York, 4 August 1735. The jury comes back in ten minutes, and the crowded hall answers with three huzzas as printer John Peter Zenger stands at the bar beside Andrew Hamilton. Rothbard is cooler than the legend: a quarrel between two factions of the landed oligarchy, though it did win truth as a defense and a jury's voice on the law. Chapter 27 of Conceived in Liberty.

Download the painting, full size (JPEG)CC BY 4.0

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0: credit freecapitalists.org. How to credit.

Adapted from Murray N. Rothbard, Conceived in Liberty (Mises Institute, 2011), CC BY 3.0.

What happened

On 4 August 1735, in the second-floor courtroom of City Hall on Wall Street, the jury withdrew and came back in about ten minutes. Asked whether John Peter Zenger was guilty of printing libels, the foreman answered Not Guilty, and, in the words of the printed narrative of the case, there were three huzzas in the hall, which was crowded with people. Zenger had sat in jail for nine months on Governor Cosby's order, and the court had disbarred his lawyers for objecting to Cosby's packing of the bench, so the Morris faction brought in Andrew Hamilton, the venerable lawyer from Philadelphia. He won by asking the jury to judge the law as well as the facts and by arguing that the articles were true. Zenger was freed the next day, and Hamilton was given a dinner and a salute of cannon when he left. Rothbard praises the two legal points, then cuts the legend down. The fight was between two factions of the landed oligarchy, truth as a defense is "a very shaky reed," and English law took neither point until 1792 and 1843 (CiL, p. 646). The real enemy of a free press in those years, he says, was the colonial Assembly.

Sources

  1. Murray N. Rothbard, Conceived in Liberty (Auburn, Ala.: Mises Institute, 2011 single-volume ed.), vol. II, ch. 27, pp. 639-653. CC BY 3.0. Rothbard
  2. [James Alexander], A Brief Narrative of the Case and Tryal of John Peter Zenger, Printer of the New-York Weekly Journal (New York, 1736), the account of the verdict, as reprinted on Encyclopedia.com (accessed 2026-09-30). Primary source
  3. 'Crown v. John Peter Zenger, 1735', Historical Society of the New York Courts (accessed 2026-09-30): the courtroom on the second floor of City Hall; Chief Justice De Lancey and Justice Philipse; foreman Thomas Hunt; cheers in the crowded courtroom; the dinner at the Black Horse Tavern and the salute of cannons; Zenger freed the day after. Secondary source
  4. National Park Service, Federal Hall, 'The Trial of John Peter Zenger' (as cited in registry/eras/middle-colonies-1710-1770): the trial in the second-floor courtroom of City Hall on the site of Federal Hall. Secondary source
  5. 'John Peter Zenger', Wikipedia (accessed 2026-09-30): born 26 October 1697; the jury retired and returned in ten minutes with a verdict of not guilty; Hamilton repeatedly rebuffed by Chief Justice DeLancey. Secondary source